Untitled Document
    
    Contact Info Feedback Site Map
    
     
     
    I am @ Talk Abuzz » Your Feedback, Our Response Register  Login   03 Sep 2010    
 
 
 
 Article Details

Health Minister to study possibility of extending Medisave for essential screenings

Speaking on the sidelines of an event to raise awareness on breast cancer recently, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Lim Hwee Hua suggested that Medisave be extended to include coverage for mammograms. Similar calls were also made by REACH contributors for the use of Medisave to be extended to include important health screenings.

 

Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan subsequently responded to Minister Lim’s suggestion via the media and MOH blog. He noted that there was a need to ensure that Singaporeans did not deplete their Medisave savings prematurely, and that as a rule of thumb, anything costing less than $100 should be paid out of pocket. Medisave was introduced primarily to pay for hospitalisation and acute medical care.

 

Whilst agreeing with the general sentiment on the benefits of early screening and preventive treatment, he shared that his Ministry promoted health screenings by subsidising them, and hence making them more affordable. For instance, breast cancer screening such as mammograms now cost as low as $50 for women above 40, and $25 for those who had not had checks in recent years.

 

However, Minister Khaw assured that he would study the issue further, and urged Singaporeans to give him time to do so.


 
 
Number of Views: 1457
Number of Comments: 10

Comments
DKchua  
13 Apr 10 , 02:28 AM

I support the use of Medisave for health screening as early detection is definitely better as it will cost much less to treat and it also encourage people to take preventive action to improve their health. What's the point of keeping Medisave for illness if they are detected much later? Medisave will not be sufficient to pay for the cost of lifelong treatment anyway.



DKchua  
13 Apr 10 , 02:19 AM

I urge Mr Khaw to looking into allowing the use of Medisave for additional health shield coverage to cover co-insurance and deductible as well. It certainly makes more sense to many people that has Medisave in access of $10K as the interest generated are more than enough to cover the insurance cost. In the event of hospitalization, would you prefer to use Medisave to pay for deductible and co-insurance and worry that Medisave will be depleted or pay a small monthly amount (which will be self-funded from the 5% interest) now and need not worry about medical cost in times of needs?


KC Tan  
07 Apr 10 , 22:58 PM

Univesal coverage for all treatment is an ideal situation. Some form of control is still necessary and consideration should be given to seniors and hardship cases with long term illness where service is taken cared by the polyclnic
,which is part of government service.



joseph_lim  
05 Apr 10 , 16:13 PM

Medisave should actually be used for any medical-related costs.


caseytana  
30 Mar 10 , 16:55 PM

Medisave for polyclinic payment is set at $300 per year which is too low for current situation, particularly for the case of long term illness. This should be revised. Afterall it is the members'very own money.



zhao qiuyue  
29 Mar 10 , 12:15 PM

Please help to stop shooting my young child with invisible radiation wave weapons everyday over six years till today,Please help to take the case and investigate.Great appreciations.


J Yeong  
04 Mar 10 , 15:49 PM

Replying to Zhong comment,the doctor was agreeable but the clinic did not carry it. Paracetamol is a standard prescription, anything else is non-standard??



Irwin  
02 Mar 10 , 18:03 PM

It seems to be a good initiative as prevention is much cheaper than cure. Detecting an illness at its earlier stages will reduce the cost of treatment. The cost would be much higher if it is caught at a later stage and it would be borne by medishield for most Singaporeans who have not opted out of the scheme.


Zhong  
23 Feb 10 , 21:10 PM

Australia has a well developed system of cancer screening for those cancers where a demonstrable cost-benefit advantage has been shown. Certainly, it makes sense for the government to subsidise (partly or totally) colorectal cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer screening and follow up if necessary, with minimum re-screening intervals. Diabetes and hypertension screening should also be included. Appropriate screening in selected population groups for these conditions is good from a clinical and public health perspective, and will help save health care and productivity cost in the long run. Consideration should also be given to using Medisave to pay for follow up that is indicated, e.g. USS and AFP following HCC resection, colonoscopy post polypectomy/bowel resection or for IBD etc. etc. As for J Yeong's comment, you should have asked why they did not think the drug you suggested was appropriate and declined the paracetamol/codeine tablets.



J Yeong  
17 Feb 10 , 13:02 PM

Medisave does serve its purpose but it should not and must be a tool for the government to tweak at its discretion.
Today, when I go to the polyclinic for consultation and as part of its standard prescription, is only given paracetamol for pain relieve. When I suggested that I would respond better to pacofen, I was given instead paracetamol/codeine tablet mix which I was promptly told is not a estandard drug and thus I had to pay more.
How much has the government truly subsidised? Yet a super scale civil servant can obtained Nexium (@$8 per tablet) for free.
Perhaps it would be pragmatic for the government to manage its cost critically, open its accounts to public scrutiny to substaniate its decision.
Don't turn to our medisave each time it needs to lessen the burden!! to the government coffers.


You must be logged in to submit a comment.

Return