Untitled Document
    
    Contact Info Feedback Site Map
    
     
     
    I am @ Talk Abuzz » Your Feedback, Our Response Register  Login   12 Mar 2010    
 
 
 
 Article Details

Health Minister to study possibility of extending Medisave for essential screenings

Speaking on the sidelines of an event to raise awareness on breast cancer recently, Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office Lim Hwee Hua suggested that Medisave be extended to include coverage for mammograms. Similar calls were also made by REACH contributors for the use of Medisave to be extended to include important health screenings.

 

Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan subsequently responded to Minister Lim’s suggestion via the media and MOH blog. He noted that there was a need to ensure that Singaporeans did not deplete their Medisave savings prematurely, and that as a rule of thumb, anything costing less than $100 should be paid out of pocket. Medisave was introduced primarily to pay for hospitalisation and acute medical care.

 

Whilst agreeing with the general sentiment on the benefits of early screening and preventive treatment, he shared that his Ministry promoted health screenings by subsidising them, and hence making them more affordable. For instance, breast cancer screening such as mammograms now cost as low as $50 for women above 40, and $25 for those who had not had checks in recent years.

 

However, Minister Khaw assured that he would study the issue further, and urged Singaporeans to give him time to do so.


 
 
Number of Views: 377
Number of Comments: 4

Comments
J Yeong  
04 Mar 10 , 15:49 PM

Replying to Zhong comment,the doctor was agreeable but the clinic did not carry it. Paracetamol is a standard prescription, anything else is non-standard??



Irwin  
02 Mar 10 , 18:03 PM

It seems to be a good initiative as prevention is much cheaper than cure. Detecting an illness at its earlier stages will reduce the cost of treatment. The cost would be much higher if it is caught at a later stage and it would be borne by medishield for most Singaporeans who have not opted out of the scheme.


Zhong  
23 Feb 10 , 21:10 PM

Australia has a well developed system of cancer screening for those cancers where a demonstrable cost-benefit advantage has been shown. Certainly, it makes sense for the government to subsidise (partly or totally) colorectal cancer, breast cancer and cervical cancer screening and follow up if necessary, with minimum re-screening intervals. Diabetes and hypertension screening should also be included. Appropriate screening in selected population groups for these conditions is good from a clinical and public health perspective, and will help save health care and productivity cost in the long run. Consideration should also be given to using Medisave to pay for follow up that is indicated, e.g. USS and AFP following HCC resection, colonoscopy post polypectomy/bowel resection or for IBD etc. etc. As for J Yeong's comment, you should have asked why they did not think the drug you suggested was appropriate and declined the paracetamol/codeine tablets.



J Yeong  
17 Feb 10 , 13:02 PM

Medisave does serve its purpose but it should not and must be a tool for the government to tweak at its discretion.
Today, when I go to the polyclinic for consultation and as part of its standard prescription, is only given paracetamol for pain relieve. When I suggested that I would respond better to pacofen, I was given instead paracetamol/codeine tablet mix which I was promptly told is not a estandard drug and thus I had to pay more.
How much has the government truly subsidised? Yet a super scale civil servant can obtained Nexium (@$8 per tablet) for free.
Perhaps it would be pragmatic for the government to manage its cost critically, open its accounts to public scrutiny to substaniate its decision.
Don't turn to our medisave each time it needs to lessen the burden!! to the government coffers.


Leave a Comment

* indicates required fields
Display Name:*   
    
Email:*  (will not be published)
Comments:
  character(s) remaining .
Disclaimer: Comments left this section are readers' own and do not reflect the views of REACH. REACH reserves the right to remove comments that are deemed inappropriate and/or insensitive to other users
Enter the code shown above:*

Return